Pro-equal oppportunities, anti equality, anti-feminist

Ok, just to clarify before people get the wrong idea - it would probably be more accurate to say I am against Female Chauvinism - which is often passed off as feminism, which not only gives true feminism (which is, in reality, simply equal opportunities) a bad name, but also makes itself look better than it actually is. This is the idea of the dominance of women (as opposed to the dominance of men) in today's society - the idea that men are useless, ignoramuses who do nothing to benefit society - that all men are lecherous, decietful, evil, and that women should have nothing to do with them - except to have sex - but they themselves are the only ones who should be capable of wielding that power - that you can only have sex by a woman's acceptance of it, simply because any man would obviously not care who the woman is, as long as they can get what they are always gagging for anyway. The other danger of female chauvinism is equality - and again, before you all come at me with pitchforks and torches, let me explain what I mean - because as you can see in the title, I am PRO- equal opportunities.

Science has proven that men and women are different - on average, men are physically stronger than women, and women have generally more dexterity than men. Generally speaking, men are better at remembering directions, but women are generally speaking, better at remembering landmarks and places. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume, that in the jobs which would favour a man's body more, such as jobs requiring heavy lifting, you will END UP WITH LESS WOMEN THAN MEN IN THAT POSITION, SINCE OUT OF THE JOB APPLICATIONS, THE MEN WILL BE MORE FAVOURED FOR THE JOB. However, imagine yourself being the interviewer for a job where a lot of heavy lifting is required. A small, weedy little man comes in for the application, and the next person up is a female bodybuilder - who should be accepted for the position? the female bodybuilder of course, since she is best suited for the job. But my complaint is against those people who say that it is discriminating against females that there are more men in that job than women - which is simply absurd, if there is any discrimination, it is purely against those who have the least muscle power - which nature has decided should, GENRALLY speaking, be women.

But this also flows out into other jobs - I constantly hear of complaints that there is not an even split of women in the workplace, and that this clearly shows that there is discrimination of women being hired for jobs - not necessarily so, I have done statistics, and you will be unlikely to find a 50:50 split. Besides, we have only just started reaching an age where women are having careers and becominbg breadwinners in their families as well - it will take time to average out - so if you look at the figures, you may well find that if you look at people in the workplace who are 40 years and over, the male-female split will be much greater than if you look at 20-40 age range, or even 20-30. Now that we have laws in place that stop companies from discriminating against gender, colour, age, and disablity, the true feminists should be happy - you have won your fair and just fight, women are equally allowed to get a job and earn money as men are - and I side with you, I believe they should, women were previously an untapped resource for today's world of business.

There is, however, one gripe that has come to my attention on which I must side with the feminists, and that is equal pay - even in huge sporting events such as wimbledon, the women tennis players get a smaller reward for winning than the men - and on average, women are paid less in the same jobs as their male counterparts - this is wrong and does need sorting, the sooner we get a law against this the better - but then that is another war won - no need to keep on harping on about it...

If I finally get back to my first point, which was that you get feminists who can do without men, who are effectively female chauvinists. Your behaviour is dangerous and worse, hypocritical - this is precisely what you criticised us for during the anti-male-chavinist movement - and I say that it is dangerous because you alienate the male gender of your own species - you turn us away from you, and to call yourselves feminists gives feminism a bad name and causes us to decide whether or not giving you this equality was such a good idea - maybe things were better when they were solely in our control. (of course, this is not true, equality is the better thing). But I would guess that the reason you have this idea is because of mistreatment by another man - this man was too a chauvinist, and outright revenge and rebellion is not the way to do things - rise above chauvinism, and fight for equality of every person on this earth.